The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
a__U11(tt, U11(tt, X212_4)) →⁺ a__U11(tt, X212_4)
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [X212_4 / U11(tt, X212_4)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)